Accessible document
Principal Investigator: Nancy C. Balcom___
Associate Investigators: _Heather M. Crawford, Tessa L. Simlick ___
Rating: Please circle the appropriate rating for each criterion, using the point scale provided. (The scale ranges from "0" for very weak, poor, unacceptable to "10" or "20", for very strong, excellent.)
Key Criteria to Consider
______________________________________________________________________
Program Objectives – are the goals and objectives clearly defined, measurable and attainable? Do the objectives appear routine or innovative?
0 5 10 15 20
Comments:
______________________________________________________________________
Activities – Are the activities related to the goals and objectives? Are they adequate, attainable and creative? Are new approaches identified? Do they appear to focus on key issues?
0 5 10 15 20
Comments:
______________________________________________________________________
Connections and Applications – Is there evidence of significant interaction with stakeholders, researchers, local, state and national agencies, other Sea Grant programs? Are regional and national efforts evident in this program?
0 5 10 15 20
Comments:
_____________________________________________________________________________
-----------------
Expected Results and Benefits – What outcomes are anticipated if the goals
and objectives are met? What local, state, regional or national impacts are
envisioned? Are they measurable?
0 5 10 15 20
Comments:
(continued on back)
Other Criteria to Consider
Staff Qualifications- Do the extension staff appear to be adequately educated, trained and experienced to undertake the proposed activities? Do the proposed activities reflect the stage of career to which individual extension staff has attained?
0 2 4 6 8 10
Comments:
______________________________________________________________________
Budget – Is the budget appropriate and adequately explained? Are there areas of the budget that seem excessively high or low? Is the appropriate match indicated?
0 2 4 6 8 10
Comments:
______________________________________________________________________
Additional Comments:
______________________________________ ____________________
Reviewer's Signature Date
_______________________________________
Reviewer's Name Typed
Note: This is an accessible version of a document originally produced for the Web in .pdf format. While it contains all significant content of the original print document, it may omit layout and graphic elements which contribute to the look and feel of the original, and make the .pdf version more suitable for printing.