This study uses semi-structured interviews and an online survey to explore the structure, challenges and outcomes of a five-year National Science Foundation-funded water scarcity modelling project in the Willamette River Basin of Oregon, USA.

The research team chose to facilitate broader impacts by engaging stakeholders from the study’s inception (e.g. developing grant proposal, study implementations, defining model run scenarios) through its completion and extension of findings. The team used various engagement formats (field trips, small and large group meetings) and encountered many challenges, including the lack of a shared vision, different professional languages, research complexities and project management. Through stakeholder engagement the team overcame challenges, facilitated learning, and improved and extended the research process and results.

Participation in engagement events was positively correlated with beneficial broader impact outcomes. Researchers compared these outcomes with NSF’s five broader impact criteria: advance scientific discovery and understanding, broaden participation of underrepresented groups, enhance research infrastructure, broadly disseminate results, and benefit society. The results show that stakeholder engagement is one method to achieve the five original NSF criteria and suggest that a sixth criterion can be achieved through stakeholder engagement–that of developing the research community.

Authors: 
Ferguson, L.; Chan, S.; Santelmann, M.; Tilt, B.
Short Description: 
This survey project explores the structure, challenges and outcomes of a five-year National Science Foundation-funded water scarcity modelling project in the Willamette River Basin of Oregon, USA.
Product Number: 
ORESU-R-18-003
Entry Date: 
Tuesday, April 3, 2018
Length: 
18 pages
Source (Journal Article): 
Water Alternatives, Volume 11, Issue 1 , 2018
Year of Publication: 
2018
How to Order: